Tuesday, September 15, 2009

"I'm really happy for you, and I'ma let you finish": A Critical Analysis of the Kanye West-VMA's incident


Seeing as how everyone on every social networking site is calling for him to be lynched (no, seriously, some people are calling for him to be lynched. Go on twitter and search the terms “Kanye West” and “lynch”), just as Kanye West defended Beyonce (whether she needed it or not is another story), someone needs to come to the defense of the fallen (by societal standards) 808s and Heartbreaks star. There are a number of issues that are so pervasive that no one is addressing, let’s call them the “Elephants in the room”.

The first elephant is simple: in the category of Best Female Video, 19 year old Taylor Swift’s video for “You Belong to Me” beat out videos by Pink, Lady Gaga, and finally Beyonce. The elephant lies in the ridiculous claim by the MTV VMAs that Taylor Swift’s video was better than Beyonce’s “Single Ladies” video. The fact that the dance for the video has been redone and reworked (even making its way into a Saturday Night Live skit) is testament to the fact that it was indeed the Best Video of the year, or as Kanye rightly stated, one of the best videos of all time. In a category like that Beyonce should have easily taken home the prize but she did not. She also didn’t take home the price for Best Pop video. That accolade went to Britney Spears for “Womanizer”. Again, nowhere near the accolades that were showered upon “Single Ladies” were showered upon “Womanizer”, yet Britney’s video bested Beyonce’s and she stood 0 for 2 on the night. Now, many will contend (I like to call this group, the Appeasers) that since Beyonce won Video of the Year, that all is right with the world. Still many (again, the Appeasers), will contend that Beyonce allowing Taylor Swift to come out and finish her acceptance speech after she won the Video of the Year award is further proof that Kanye was completely wrong and that Beyonce felt that Kanye was wrong. It only proves that Beyonce felt bad about the situation and wanted to smooth things over on her end, which is a legitimate concern of hers. Some have even gone further to defend Beyonce’s defeat by saying that MTV did the fair thing by giving everyone one award. However, minor research shows that just last year MTV gave Britney Spears, Best Female Video, Best Pop Video, and Video of the Year, for “Piece of Me”. Which leads me to my next poi--, err, elephant: race.

There are many who are going to immediately stop reading this because of the insistence upon some racial focus here. These people, I like to call, Post-Racialists. To their claim, I argue that to deny that there is no racial significance in Beyonce, the only woman of color who as Kanye West argued, one of the Best Videos of all time, being rationed awards to the appeasement of two white artists, is to deny the still consistent racial overtones of our society. To deny that there is no racial significance in the backlash at Kanye West that has manifested itself in racist language (a simple Twitter search of the terms “Kanye West” and “Nigger” produces astonishing results) is to deny the pervasively racist society in which we live. To deny that the there is no racial significance in the demonization of West by mass media and society a la social networking is to deny that the pseudo-scientific racial theories of inferiority and savagery that were prevalent throughout the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, the legacy of which was felt in the 20th century, has had any effect on the 21st century. In many ways, having Kanye West, this powerful image of Blackness, verbally “attack” Taylor Swift, the All-American “Aww-Shucks” image of Whiteness, is unsettling to a lot of people, many of whom are calling for the star to be lynched. What is left out is the forced appeasement at the sacrifice, whether accepted or not, of Taylor Swift and Britney Spears (both white females) at the expense of Beyonce (a woman of color). There is a precedent in the previous year of one video receiving all three awards, and a video of the viral magnitude of Beyonce’s should have easily repeated the “hat trick” trend. I, unlike my Post-Racialist friends, am not ready to simply write the offense off as a coincidence. Finally, the demonization of Kanye West by everyone from Perez Hilton to Barack Obama, leads me to my third and final elephant: societal priorities.

We are still fighting two wars. We are engaged in a major healthcare reform debate. Yet, Kanye West’s statement (I refuse to lay the negative connotation of “outburst” on his action) has taken front page press. When Joe Wilson yelled that President Obama was a liar, it did not receive anywhere near the public outcry as did Kanye’s statement. This problem I attribute to those whom I will call Tweeters. I won’t belabor this point, but It’s a sad sign for a country when celebrities or athletes (lest we forget about Serena Williams’ weekend) are held to a higher moral standard than our elected officials. There is an alternate explanation for this phenomenon (what I term the Perez Hilton Paradox). This alternate explanation, however, will upset my Post-Racialist friends. But for the sake of scholarship, let’s just say it involves the traditional image of whites in superior conditions to blacks, and so we are socially conditioned to the image of Joe Wilson questioning President Obama. In fact, some of us are confused as to why his statement wasn’t more of an imperative (i.e., “You stop lying boy”). But that’s a topic that has been semi addressed already.

I would be remiss to finish this without taking a serious look at the fact that Kanye West apologized to Taylor Swift…more than once. The apologies, Swift has stated were sincere, but it’s the apology on the Jay Leno Show that I want to look at a bit more. Jay Leno, in a very provocative moment, asked Kanye West what his mother would think of what he did and for the first time since the death of Dr. Donda West, Kanye West was forced to get off the rollercoaster ride that was his life and see the person he has become. When Dr. West passed, Kanye was hurt. When his fiancé left him shortly after, the world that he had known and appropriated had been snatched away from him and so he placed all of his heartbreak into the one place that was left, his music. Kanye West’s Heartbreaks led him to his 808s. Since the passing of Dr. Donda West, we have seem what happens when genius and pain cohabitate. We are given the gift of a great product (808s and Heartbreaks is in my eyes a classic because of its groundbreaking concept) but the curse of the tormented soul behind the product not being nourished. Once the 808s were turned off, the beating of the heartbreak persisted. Kanye West’s decision to take some time off is probably not ideal for Hip-Hop, but it is necessary for West. In order to retain the College Dropout, we must give him his Fall Break.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

there are a couple of points i think need to be made here. the first of which is your contention that there is a precident for videos winning all three categories (best female/pop/overall video). you argue that as recently as last year britney spears won all 3 categories. this is true, but more thorough research reveals some interesting results. these three categories have existed together since 1999. since then, besides spears, in only two years has any artist won in more than one of these categories. in 2005 kelly clarkson won female and pop with "since u been gone" and in 1999 lauryn hill won female and overall with "doo wop (that thing)". in the 11 years these three awards have been given out, there have been three repeat winners, two of which won only two awards. i fail to see the "precident" on which you base your argument.

in a somewhat less academic sense, "you belong with me" is a newer song than "single ladies". "single ladies " peaked at 1 on the billboard charts in early december 2008, while "you belong with me" peaked in august 2009. since not an academy, but fans, vote on awards, it does not seem far-fetched to think that taylor swift's video is simply fresher in voters' minds than beyonce's (admittedly superior) video. you will also notice that there is no distinction made in the award categories between song and video. is it not conceivable, then, that fans would cast their votes based on their favorite song and not their favorite video? i can't speak for these people, but it is something to be given serious consideration.

my third point is that you seem to be overlooking a fairly basic level of decency that kanye did not demonstrate. he got drunk (this according to one of his bodyguards) in his seat and stole a microphone during a girl's acceptance speech. was his statement correct? yes, but that cannot possibly excuse the fact that he didn't give a young lady the courtesy of accepting an award that she had won.

in summary, i don't see the racial element here that you see. maybe it's because i'm white. or maybe it's because i looked back in VMA awards history to when the three awards first coexisted, analyzed relative release dates and chart performance for each song, and expect all people (celebrities, athletes, and especially politicians) to be courteous towards each other especially in moments of disagreement. west should be forgiven, and i'm sure he will be. just please don't make the mistake of turning this into a racial issue so quickly. it dismisses kanye west's drunken, rude behavior far too easily by placing guilt on white folks for thinking poorly of his actions.

Wil Redmond said...

Sean,

First of all, thank you for engaging in the dialogue. I hope that more will join the conversation.

I will address each of your concerns in the order that you have presented them in order to maintain the coherency of your arguments.

On the issue of precedent, I'm not sure if your argument does what you intend it to do. In fact, I believe that your argument actually further validates my argument. If "in the 11 years [that] these three awards have been given out" no one had won all three, then yes my argument of precedent is dead where it stands. However, your admitted concession that someone won all three at one point indicates precedent. My argument is against those who say that there is no precedent for someone winning all three. Proof that someone won all three establishes precedent.

I will agree that the MTV Video Music Awards are the farthest thing from the academy, however, your argument for why Taylor Swift's video may have won is somewhat flawed and I will show this by using the previous winner of all three awards, Britney Spears' "Piece of Me". Your argument hinges on the fact that maybe the outdated (in your opinion, certainly not in mine) "Single Ladies" had escaped the ADHD minds of the fans who voted on the video. However, "more thorough research reveals" that Britney Spears' "Piece of Me" peaked on the charts at number 18 ( a far cry from Beyonce's #1) on February 9th. However, after the song picked, other songs from all three categories including Katy Perry's summer hit "I Kissed a Girl", Rihanna's "Take a Bow", and The Jonas Brothers' "Burnin' Up" were released with the Jonas Brothers having the latest release date of June 19, 2008 and peaking eventually at #5 on the Billboard Charts. If your argument places chronology as a major reason why Taylor Swift's admittedly inferior video won, then there is precedent (funny how that word comes up again) to disprove that fact. By your logic, the Jonas Brothers should have taken home the prize because it was the most chronologically relevant.

Furthermore, I address the belief by Kanye West that he himself was in the wrong. Drunkenness is never an excuse and as such was something that ignored but I did address the troubled nature of the 808s and Heartbreaks star.

I can't summarize to end, as you have done, because the issue of race was brought up, and was not addressed in the first three points above. That is, unless, your addressing of the three points above is your way of saying that there was no racial undertone. If that is the point you are attempting to make, then I hope you understand that it being an undertone in your arguments, makes it an undertone in the entire argument. I, however, do not want to read positions into your argument. However, I want to make very clear that there is a major difference between, as you state it, "placing guilt on white folks for thinking poorly of his actions" and elucidating the fact that many on the "blogosphere" have sunk to calling Kanye West a Nigger and calling for him to be lynched. Considering the history of our nation, I don't think it's a far reach to say that there is some racial undertone there.

I hope I was able to further elucidate my points to you. I refuse to resign the conversation to say that "you are white, you wouldn't understand". It just may take a little more for you to see it.

All the best and thanks for engaging me.

~Wil Redmond

+André said...

Love the blog, please follow me as well...