Tuesday, July 29, 2008

NaS' Masterpiece

About a week and a half ago, I became the owner of one of the greatest hip hop albums ever. Trust me when I say that I am not exaggerating. Nasty NaS makes a triumphant return with this politically-charged, controversy-laden polemic set to incredible beats. Everytime I listen to this album I get goosebumps. It has the feel of Hip-Hop is Dead, but its more raw. It has more emotion in it. Needless to say, NaS really brings it in this album but doesnt get the credit he deserved. Unlike a certain artist who sold "A Milli" on incredible hype and codeine-laced lyrics, NaS actually takes a stand against adversaries Bill O'Reilly and Fox News in both song and petition. In a time where we are on the cusp of our first Black President, but still at war and in need of a "Hero", NaS comes through like the Dark Knight.

I am somewhat upset at the media uproar over NaS' decision to change the title of the album from Nigger. I think there was, in many ways, an infringement upon his freedom to artistically express himself. I really dont believe, after listening to the album nonstop, that NaS attempted to title it nigger because he does a very good job at attempting to rewire the thinking behind the word. His album does not limit the term to simply black people but all oppressed people. I mean, there was not nearly as much of an uproar when Randall Kennedy published his book titled Nigger. It also does the same thing in trying to "defang" the word. Your thoughts?

Friday, July 25, 2008

Frenzy Friday - State of the Race


As promised, I begin my Frenzy Friday (working title) with this post. I recently watched CNN's Special Report: Black in America. While the special was only 4 hours total, I feel it gave a minor glimpse of of how it is to be a Black person in America, however, it is the responsibility of Black people throughout the country to provide our own voice. It is not CNN's responsibility to provide solutions to the problems of the community (although they did provide examples), it is our responsibility. With that said, I want to focus my thoughts on one segment of the show that I think is extremely important for our community to discuss: the issue of Black male/female relationships.

There is a pervasive problem in the culture with male treatment of women. Women are not seen in a very positive light by male members within the community and it seems to spread out into the general population. In watching CNN's special, there were three main areas that they focused on that I want to tackle. Issues of the Black Family, Dating and Relationships, and Portrayal in the Media. It is generally my practice, and probably academically driven, that I provide some history and for the sake of some credibility I will do so here, albeit less than I normally would.

Historically speaking, the Black Family was doomed from the day it set foot on this continent. It benefited slave traders to break up the family, so they did just that. Needless to say, the lack of men in the families, led enslaved women on plantations to lead an almost matriarchal society. The men married and had children on plantations and were shipped off to another plantation without any care or concern for the welfare of the family. So many men ended up fathering many families and wedding many different women on different plantations. So from a historical standpoint, its no wonder that there are 70% of Black women who are single parents. However, to place the blame solely on a historical basis would be irresponsible and wrong.

So this problem of the Black Family, and also the lack of men in these families, stems from the breakdown in the relationships between Black Men and Black Women. Some Black men who I have spoken to have said that Black Women are "materialistic", "too picky", "setting the standard to high". Personally, I believe that this thought process is what dooms the Black Male to the life that he lives, and in many ways is dooming the Black family and ultimately the Black race. In the CNN special, the 3 major factors that separated Black Men from Black Women were education, economy, and incarceration. In many ways the disparity begins with the fact that Black Women have an overwhelming command of the academy compared to Black Men (a 3:1 ratio). This of course leads to poorer economic conditions, which lend themselves to increasing incarceration. But is that the brunt of it? Black Women have been the staple of the race, being both the bearer of life and, in recent years, the bread-winner. So is that where the problems lie? Has systematic racism completely emasculated the Black Man and left the woman "in charge"? Or is the Black Man simply intimidated by strong, intelligent, educated, beautiful women who will challenge the establishment and status quo? Part of me thinks he is. Why you ask?

I remember thinking about the image of the Black Man in prison and the Black Man in school and thinking that the scholarly Black Man is an exception rather than the rule. I'm not sure how the stats reflect on that but its something that the majority of people undoubtedly believe. However, I cannot help but think about the fact that the majority of the images that the world sees of Black Women are them showcasing their assets on music videos with some rapper or other male in a power position. Yet, the stats actually show the exact opposite. Black women are effectively running the show in Black America. So, why is there a disparity in the real and the actual for Black Women?

I must admit I was asked to write this post by my best friend, an incredibly strong and brilliant Black woman. Her concern, which is the concern of Black Women from coast to coast, is what must or can Black women do to marry or even date inside of the race? My belief is that they keep being themselves. The problem isn't Black Women, its Black Men. Believe me, there are plenty of Black Men doing the positive thing and fighting stereotypes and making a way for themselves in legitimate ways around the country. But those stories are not being broadcasted and Black Boys have no legitimate role models outside of mediocre, misogynistic rap stars. They absorb the images of the Black man in dominate positions on TV, although those positions are often the result of some illegitimate activities. I used to believe that my difference in opinion came from my experience with positive, strong females in my life (read: My mother, sisters, aunts, friends). However, I have seen the exact same experiences used to explain reasons why they shouldn't respect women because these women are not their mothers, sisters, aunts, friends, and therefore are not deserving of this respect.

So where do the repairs begin? It has to start with Black Men. It has to start with us holding ourselves accountable and holding each other accountable for respecting ourselves and our beautiful sisters. We have to take responsibility for the plight of our people. Its only through us that we can make the change necessary.

Wow, that was a ton, but its definitely a discussion that needs to happen. So let's discuss. Your thoughts?

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Quick Update

Just checking in to let you all know whats up. Some of you know about the "groundbreaking CNN Special Black in America" that debuts tonight at 9pm. Its a two day special with today tackling Black Women and Family and tomorrow tackling The Black Man. Needless to say, I have had this special on my calendar since I first heard about it and Im glad its finally here. I've read great reviews thus far, but I have read some skepticism from Black people. Im sure there will be some critiques and things of that nature.

But here's a quick rundown of what Friday's blog entries (Yes, entries as in multiple) will address:

-A review of the Black in America special
-A beginning to a discussion on Black Female/Male relations as requested by my best friend, Gabby.
-Also, seeing as how I'm going into Seminary (ETA in Atlanta: 20 days), I want to have a frank discussion about church issues, from my own very liberal standpoint and get some feedback.
-There may also be a review of two really good albums. Tryin to mix it up a little.

I'm tempted to do multiple entries that are really thought out every friday and I'm working on a title for it. Stay Tuned because this week ought to be good.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Check out The Blueprint!!!

Arkitekt and I joined up on a blog post to talk about Obama's recent appearance on the cover of the New Yorker. Its the first in what will hopefully be a good conversation series. Check it out here.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Self Reliance and the NAACP

Watching Bill O'Reilly and his talking points made me start to think about Barack Obama and the so-called "Self-Reliance" tour. There seems to be a disconnect by O'Reilly and many others in understanding Obama's message on self-reliance that he has delivered. Obama's message is one of personal reliance. O'Reilly, in his brilliance of No-Spin reporting, attempted to portray Obama's message of self-reliance as being something that only Obama could do in front of the NAACP. Excuse me for stating the obvious, but duh Bill. Barack is talking about personal accountability, specifically within the Black community of which he is a member. He has the right and, in many ways, the responsibility to preach personal accountability to the Black community. The personal accountability that Obama preaches should lead to holding our government to a higher level of accountability. Is not that what we need now? A government who the people can hold accountable. A government who the people can trust. We must start by trusting ourselves.

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Legacy of Leadership


I originally planned on posting about Jesse Jackson's ridiculous comments but my man Nellz did as good of a job as I would have, so I definitely urge you to go and check it out (arkitekt's blueprint). Yet, there is something I want to address with this entry and thats the legacy of leadership. Since before the end of the Civil Rights movement (or what tons of people say is the end, seeing as how the movement isnt over), there has been a fight for prominence and leadership of the "black community". I have argued before, and again argue now, that beginning April 5, 1968 (the day after the assassination of Dr. King), there has been a constant struggle for the control of the continuation of the movement. With no recognized leader present to take the lead, the movement lost its luster and was in an uproar. However, it would be historically myopic to constrict the power struggle to this time period. In fact, there were noted struggles between King's SCLC and Stokley Carmichael's SNCC over the direction of the movement and perceptions of leadership. Carmichael and SNCC were upset that King was getting most of the media attention, while they were doing "most of the work". They were also fed up with the continued non-violence of the movement and were seeking to convert the movement to the militant strand that preached Black Power. King feared that the slogan of Black Power would confuse white people, as it did, and further hurt the movement, again as it did. So the fight over mission and strategy, as well as recognition plagued the movement early on, however, after the death of King, the leadership struggles of the movement were amplified by a need for a leader to continue the movement. The death of King led the selfless to become selfish and led them to stray away from the flock like sheep without a master. It is known by many that King declared Ralph Abernathy to lead the movement. However, Abernathy's lack of leadership ability and vision (at least in comparison to MLK) led to his losing control of SCLC and lead to the rise of Jesse Jackson amongst other people. So what then is the legacy of Dr.King's Leadership? Barack Obama seems to be next in the trend of charismatic, compassionate, intelligent leadership needed to transform this country into what it claims to be: One nation, under God, indivisble, with liberty and justice for all. So why the hate from Jesse Jackson? The answer is that it is a problem that is endemic to the Black Community, as well as our national community. You see, the Civil Right generation is exiting the stage and they are having a hard time dealing with a society that is working to be more integrated and globalized. The problems that people of color faced during the Civil Rights generation's heyday have become problems for more than one group of people and the post-Civil Rights generation is looking to correct all problems not just one. It is a multifaceted attack on the social and institutional ills of our society. So it is a shift from the days of marching and boycotting that is understandably unsettling for them to experience this dramatic shift. What Jesse Jackson said is inexcusable. To make matters worse, the questionable Al Sharpton came to his defense. It didnt help much. There is new leadership in place to take this country to the heights that it should be taken to. While the "old guard" is much appreciated, it is time for a change that can be seen and felt. Besides, Jesse and Al, in the past 21 years, havent spoken for a cause that I think they should be speaking on. Neither of them (both Reverends) defended Jeremiah Wright. They both remind me of the Rev. Rollo Goodlove . Your thoughts?

Monday, July 7, 2008

Stadium Seating + Change= Win?


Barack Obama and the DNC has decided to hold Obama's nomination in Mile-High Stadium, home to the Denver Broncos. The stadium hold 75,000, which is monstrous compared to the original venue which would hold 20,000. I mean, the man can pack a house, but 75,000 people. He's officially reached Rockstar status. With the message of change, is this a good direction for politics? Barack Obama has run on the message of change, and it has successfully carried him through the primaries. But how long, will simply the message last in the general campaign? McCain is constantly attacking Barack Obama for not having a firm stance on issues, but is it possible for someone (read McCain) to have too firm of a stance? There's an excitement in this country, and even around the world, in hopes that Barack Obama and his message of change will take the election. I must say personally, that I am extremely excited for the future of this country. But can America take 4 years of McBush policies? To put it bluntly, this country is going to hell in a handbasket, when most of the world hates us, gas costs an arm and a leg, the economy is shit, and Iran telling America to "Just Bring It" if it wants to go to war. We are in dire need of change and I may be the only one who believes that even symbolic change may change the attitudes of this country. Colgate University President, Rebecca Chopp, has said numerous times, somtimes you have to believe in something before you can change your actions. Does America qualify for that type of attitude now?

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Independence Day...but for whom?

So I am in the process of writing a really good blog entry about my thesis project on the Black Church, but its a really involved entry and I dont want to mess it up. However, I just thought about independence day since its July 4th (well at least on the east coast and in the flood ravaged midwest). Thinking about independence day and the fact that it ended the fight for the country we live in now, my DuBoisian double consciousness makes me think about the ramifications of Independence Day on Black people. You see 17th Century slavery was essentially breaking in the slaves. It was, in comparison, one of the harshest times for those who were enslaved. Beatings were brutal, rapes were rampant, and families were separated relentlessly in order to further cement the horrible institution. In the 18th century, things were better, but not by so much. So in 1776, there were no distinct difference for those forced into the condition of slavery, when the whole of teh country celebrated its independence. While I understand that it is the day the colonies of the United States becomes independent, there was no immediate benefit to those who were enslaved. So I propose a new Independence day: Juneteenth. A little history, June 19th or juneteenth (as the derivation from the portmanteau of the two words June and 19th), is not the day of the signing of the emancipation proclamation (September 22, 1862) or the day in which it took effect (January 1, 1863). Its not even the day in which the Emancipation Proclamation was ratified into the Constitution as the Thirteenth Amendment (December 18, 1865). Instead, it commemorates the day, June 19, 1865, in which the federal government rode into Texas to enforce the passing of the law, thereby using federal authority to free the slaves. It became the day when the United States government (for not so noble reason, but they did it anyway) used their full military force to free the enslaved African Americans. So why is it not considered a federal holiday like Independence Day? As it stands only 29 states recognize it as a state holiday. Where are the other 21? For a country that is still reeling from the after effects of slavery, the celebration of a holiday like Juneteenth can do wonders for the nation and would be the first in a few steps that hopefully would lead to a federal apology for slavery. I mean, the federal government has already apologized to Native Americans for the way they were (mis-) treated. Why not apologize to African-Americans? If not an apology, lets at least make it a federal holiday and begin repairing the psyche of the United States.